ABSTRACT
O tratamento convencional do aneurisma da artéria poplítea é a cirurgia aberta de exclusão do aneurisma e revascularização do membro acometido. Nos últimos anos, o tratamento endovascular vem ganhando popularidade e interesse. O tratamento endovascular é menos invasivo e de menor morbidade; porém, é de alto custo e sua perviedade é incerta. O objetivo desta revisão é comparar os dois tratamentos através da análise de desfechos abordados em estudos primários e secundários. Realizou-se uma revisão narrativa da literatura publicada nos últimos 5 anos. Foram selecionados seis estudos retrospectivos, duas metanálises, um ensaio clínico e uma revisão sistemática Cochrane. Número limitado de pacientes e curto período de seguimento não nos permitem extrair conclusões consistentes. Não há evidência clara que sugere melhores resultados entre um ou outro tratamento eletivo. Novos ensaios randomizados devem ser realizados para determinar o papel do tratamento endovascular desse aneurisma
he conventional treatment for a popliteal artery aneurysm is open surgery to exclude the aneurysm and revascularization of the affected limb. Over recent years, endovascular treatment has grown in popularity and has been attracting increased interest. Endovascular treatment is less invasive and associated with lower rates of morbidity, but it is expensive and patency is uncertain. The aim of this review is to compare these two treatments by analyzing the outcomes reported in primary and secondary studies. A narrative review is conducted of the literature published over the last 5 years. Six retrospective studies, two meta-analyses, one clinical trial and one Cochrane systematic review were selected. We were unable to draw firm conclusions because of small patient samples and short follow-up periods. There is no clear evidence to indicate that the outcomes of one or another elective treatment are superior. New randomized trials should be conducted to determine the role endovascular treatment has to play in management of this type of aneurysm
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Aneurysm/complications , Vascular Patency , Comparative Study , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Sex Factors , Risk Factors , Ultrasonography/methods , Age FactorsABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: Intimal hyperplasia is associated with graft failure and vascular sutures in the first year after surgery and in postangioplasty restenosis. Allium sativum (common garlic) lowers cholesterol and has antioxidant effects; it also has antiplatelet and antitumor properties and, therefore, has great potential to reduce or inhibit intimal hyperplasia of the arteries. Our objective is to determine if the garlic has an efficacy to inhibit myointimal hyperplasia compared to cilostazol. Methods: Female New Zealand rabbits were divided into the following groups (n=10 each) according to treatment: group A, garlic, 800 µg×kg-1×day-1, orally; group C, cilostazol, 50 mg.day-1, orally; group PS, 10 ml of 0.9% physiological saline solution, orally. Our primary is the difference of the mean of myointimal hyperplasia. Statistical analysis was performed by using ANOVA and Tukey tests, as well as the Chi-square test. We calculated the 95% confidence interval for each point estimate, and the P value was set as < 0.05. Results: Group PS had a mean hyperplasia rate of 35.74% (95% CI, 31.76–39.71%); group C, 16.21% (95% CI, 13.36–19.05%); and group A, 21.12% (95% CI, 17.26–25.01%); P<0.0001. Conclusion: We conclude that Allium sativum had the same efficacy in inhibiting myointimal hyperplasia when compared to the positive control, cilostazol.
Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Rabbits , Arteriosclerosis/prevention & control , Tetrazoles/pharmacology , Tunica Intima/pathology , Garlic/chemistry , Arteriosclerosis/pathology , Immunohistochemistry , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Cilostazol , Hyperplasia/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Objective: to assess post-angioplasty myointimal hyperplasia in iliac artery of rabbits treated with extract of Moringa oleifera leaves. Methods : we conducted a randomized trial in laboratory animals for five weeks of follow-up, developed in the Vivarium of Pharmaceutical Technology Laboratory of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba. We used rabbits from the New Zealand breed, subjected to a hypercholesterolemic diet and angioplasty of the external iliac artery, randomized into two groups: M200 Group (n=10) - rabbits treated with 200mg/kg/day of Moringa oleifera leaves extract orally; SF group (n=10) - rabbits treated with 0.9% saline orally. After five weeks, the animals were euthanized and the iliac arteries prepared for histology. Histological sections were analyzed by digital morphometry. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test. The significance level was 0.05. Results : there was no significant difference in myointimal hyperplasia between M200 and SF groups when comparing the iliac arteries submitted to angioplasty. Conclusion : there was no difference of myointimal hyperplasia between groups treated with saline and Moringa oleifera after angioplasty.
Objetivo: determinar a diferença da média de hiperplasia miointimal pós-angioplastia na artéria ilíaca de coelhos tratados e não tratados com extrato das folhas de Moringa oleifera. Métodos: ensaio aleatório em animais de laboratório por cinco semanas de seguimento, desenvolvido no Biotério do Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica da Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Foram utilizadas coelhas da raça Nova Zelândia, submetidas à dieta hipercolesterolêmica e angioplastia da artéria ilíaca externa, randomizadas em dois grupos: Grupo M200 (n=10), coelhas tratadas com 200mg/kg/dia de extrato de folhas de Moringa oleifera, por via oral; Grupo SF (n=10), coelhas tratadas com soro fisiológico 0,9%, por via oral. Após cinco semanas, os animais foram eutanaziados e as artérias ilíacas preparadas para histologia. Os cortes histológicos foram analisados por morfometria digital. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste t de Student. O nível de significância foi 0,05. Resultados: comparando as artérias ilíacas submetidas à angioplastia do grupo M200 com as do grupo SF, não houve diferença significativa da hiperplasia miointimal Conclusão: não houve diferença da hiperplasia miointimal nos grupos tratados com soro fisiológico e Moringa oleifera após angioplastia.